Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the current funding crisis facing Pittsburgh Regional Transit?
PRT is facing a significant budget shortfall due to the scheduled expiration of Act 89 funding, which has provided critical, predictable support for transit operations since 2013.
What is Act 89 and why is it expiring?
Act 89 is a transportation funding bill passed by the Pennsylvania legislature in 2013. It provided a long-term investment in the state’s transportation infrastructure, including public transit. However, some of its key provisions—particularly the transfer of funds from the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission—are set to end, with no permanent funding mechanism in place to replace them.
What is PRT's deficit?
PRT used $50 million from its reserve fund to fill a budget deficit in Fiscal Year 2025. In Fiscal Year 2026, the deficit is projected to grow to $100 million, and it will continue to grow each year if no replacement for Act 89 is established.
What will happen if new funding isn’t secured?
Without new, sustainable funding, PRT may have to reduce service levels, eliminate routes, raise fares, and delay or cancel capital projects. This would disproportionately affect riders who rely on transit for work, school, and essential services—especially those in marginalized or transit-dependent communities.
Why is public transit funding important to the region?
A strong public transit system supports regional economic growth, provides access to jobs and education, reduces traffic congestion and emissions, and enhances quality of life. Transit also supports workforce participation, especially for people without access to a car.
What is PRT doing to prevent service cuts?
PRT is actively engaging with state and federal leaders, local officials, businesses, and community stakeholders to advocate for a long-term funding solution. The agency is also exploring operational efficiencies.
How can I help?
Riders, employers, and residents can help by contacting their state legislators and urging them to support sustainable public transit funding. Participating in public meetings, spreading the word on social media, and joining local advocacy efforts can also make a difference.
Why doesn’t PRT operate smaller buses? Would that save money?
While it might seem like smaller buses would be cheaper to operate, the reality is more complex. The biggest cost of transit service is labor—not fuel or vehicle size. A driver operating a 15-passenger van costs roughly the same as one driving a 40-foot bus, but the larger vehicle carries more people, making it more efficient on busy routes.
Additionally, most PRT buses are scheduled to be on the road all day, serving a variety of trips. While a smaller vehicle might make sense for a lightly used portion of the day, it wouldn’t be able to handle higher ridership during peak times. Sending a vehicle back to the garage to swap for a larger one adds cost, delays, and inefficiencies. PRT does use smaller vehicles where appropriate—especially in low-ridership areas or for paratransit—but for most routes, full-size buses are the most flexible and cost-effective choice.
What type of efficiencies have been implemented by PRT to control costs?
PRT has taken a number of significant steps to reduce costs and operate more efficiently, especially in response to post-pandemic ridership patterns:
-
Service adjustments: Since the pandemic, PRT has reduced scheduled service by approximately 13%, aligning operations with current demand while maintaining service equity.
-
Parking cost reduction: By adjusting to new commuter patterns, PRT reduced the annual amount it spends on leases and licenses for park-and-ride and commuter parking spaces by approximately 65% from FY 2020 to FY 2024.
-
IT infrastructure savings: PRT’s IT team has migrated significant data storage to in-house servers, saving approximately $38,000 per month currently. Over the next eight months, as more data is transitioned, monthly savings will increase to $109,000, resulting in over $1 million in annual savings once the project is complete.
-
Fuel price management: By locking in diesel fuel prices well below budget estimates, PRT expects to save approximately $1.3 million in FY25 and $1.9 million in FY26.
-
Healthcare cost control: In 2025, PRT eliminated coverage of GLP-1 medications when used for weight loss alone. This change will avoid an estimated $1.15 million in annual costs.
These efforts reflect PRT’s ongoing commitment to fiscal responsibility while continuing to provide essential transit services to the region.
If additional state and local funding is provided, how will the funds be spent?
PRT will put any additional funds received directly toward maintaining and improving service. The $117 million being sought for FY 2026 and beyond would allow PRT to avoid cuts, maintain its current service levels for at least the next decade, and move forward with the Bus Line Redesign—an ambitious effort to expand and modernize the system, improving frequency, access, and countywide connectivity.